|
Though
Federation space is littered with sensor platforms, transmitter beacons
and route markers, spacecraft still use certain astronomical features to
orientate themselves, this redundancy in flight navigation is essential
outside of Federation territory and allows for craft use in emergency
crises where standard navigation nets have been shut down. Spacecraft
are apt for finding their own way about in space, they are covered with
powerful accurate sensors, which are sensitive to a whole host of
different navigational cues. Some of the commonly used natural phenomena
are shown below, along with the astrogation techniques that make use of
these phenomena.
Star
spotting
For
supra light vehicles knowing the positions of the stars is not so
immediately helpful as traveling across many light years the positions
of stars will shift, instead computers will scan the skies for certain
unusual stars. An unusual star may be a star with exceptional brightness
or peculiar spectral class, by comparing the spectra of these unusual
cases a computer can estimate from the known coordinates of these stars
whereabouts the ship is. The use of these known standards is at least
useful within federation space, and as these stars are observed at
distances thousands of light years away from federation space they also
provide useful navigational tools outside of familiar space.
Pulsars
A
simple sensitive radio telescope will be able to detect and determine
the source of these cyclic radio patterns, these astoundingly regular
features make exceptionally good beacons. Using the positions of known
pulsars the position of the ship can again be calculated. There are
however a few problems with this method. The first is that some pulsars
have similar frequencies, a problem that is exacerbated when the ship is
moving at relativistic speeds as correcting for ‘real’ rate is
troublesome. Another problem is that signal strength may vary as the
ship’s angle to the pulsar changes (directional beams), another minor
problem is the slow spin down of pulsars as one approaches the pulsar
(and the radio waves received are therefore younger) the pulsar seems to
spin down, this in itself is not a problem if there is certainty of the
right object, but such differences can confuse two similar frequency
pulsars if other factors do not aid differentiation.
Gravitational
wave sources
Using
a completely different type of instrument again, mass sensors are able
to pick up these tell tale waves, and like pulsars are for the radio
spectrum, there are some sources that generate cyclical gravitational
waves, such as close binaries or black hole pulsar systems. By tracing
the direction of these signals and measuring their telltale frequency to
identify them the positions of these sources can be used to extrapolate
the position of the space craft. Like with pulsars the direction of
these waves tend to be propagated along a particular plane, and
attenuation will occur if the space craft is not in a similar plane, using one
source alone this may give a false approximation of distance. A feature
of this system is that every spacecraft has a good system to detect
these signals as the asymmetric propulsion field is uniquely sensitive
to these kind of spatial disturbances.
Nebulae
Using
the structure of nebulae for navigation is particularly troublesome,
they tend to be diffuse and indistinct systems with complex topology,
but they have few unique identifiers, mostly their spectrum which serves
to fingerprint them. Astrogation based on nebulae alone is imprecise and
troublesome, but it does give supporting evidence to other methods. All
that is needed for this method is a database of the nebulae fingerprints
and a simple scanning spectrometer (infra red usually).
Galaxies.
As
these objects are so far away there abilities to determine position
within our own galaxy is next to useless, but they do provide that
ultimate last resort just to prove that the spacecraft is after all in
the correct galaxy. Of more use is using our galaxy's attending
satellites, most notably the Magellanic clouds to triangulate some
relative positioning of the spacecraft, but again this is imprecise and
would only be ever used if the spacecraft was to accidentally transport
itself to some far flung corner of our own galaxy (as inevitably happens
when poking around with mysterious ancient artifacts).
These
methods alone can be used as astronavigation tools, but more commonly an
onboard computer will use these techniques simultaneously and a
combination of other techniques available to it (comparing the
properties of local space with known navigation data, such as particle
abundance) as well as comparing to charts from a series of known
standards in space and grading similarity to reach conclusive decisions
on its whereabouts.
A
ship should never really have to perform this task from scratch as it
will continuously record its flight path, but occasional checks are made
to correlate its apparent movements with real space. The only time where
the navigational computer will perform a whole navigational location
sequence is either where it had suffered complete system failure and had
therefore been traveling blind for a while, or where a phenomena had
obscured all its usual sensors and again the ship would have not been
able to observe its relative position with space. |