Docking
approach procedures (spacecraft)
Occasionally a space craft will need to hard attach itself to
some space structure, such as a space station or another space vehicle,
and in these special circumstances special modes of operation have to be
in use when docking.
Engines
Because of the potentially destructive nature of the
gravitational propulsion most ships use, these flight systems must be
replaced by ‘docking soft’ systems that do not cause the risk of
damaging the other vehicle. Most spacecraft have a number of secondary
drives, mostly fusion flame or cold gas, the later is preferred for
docking, as there is less danger associated with these drives. A
sophisticated and large vessel will begin exchanging to these systems a
good deal from the target (unless fuel conservation is critical), and
will have already decelerated a great deal. Smaller ships can use their
normal propulsion drives until within about 50km of the docking target
in which case they will either have to exchange to the docking soft
systems, or, if the vehicle has no soft systems, use very mild spatial
curvature which will not damage the target.
After switching from primary drives down to an appropriate
docking drive the ship will decelerate to an almost stop as it prepares
to finally contact, in all ships the final velocity of the craft is
rarely greater than 10cm/s, approaches harder than this probably wont
damage the docking devices, but may impart enough energy to greatly
destabilize or spin the two vehicles. At very close ranges to docking,
using fusion flame is strictly prohibited, since these drives work by
reaction, slowing down to dock should not require toasting the target in
fusion flame, the cut off for this kind of drive is absolute within 50m
(pulses less than 0.5 in 5 seconds) and again at 200m (continuous drive
but at flared reaction to minimize heat focus).
Release after docking is usually assisted by some mechanical
thrust from the docking collar which starts to push the craft apart, a
ship without cold gas drives will have to drift away until drives it can
use can be activated, ships equipped with cold gas drives (nitrogen,
helium etc.) can beginning using these drives immediately. As with
docking certain drives can not be used in close proximity though when
suitably distant from the docking target primary drives can be used
again for proper flight.
Navigation and alignment
Docking requires some very accurate fixes to ensure that the ship
is properly aligned with the docking cradle, in certain ways the
alignment has to be better than the ship would normally use when flying
interstellar. The space craft will already have a comprehensive suite of
sensors which although used for other purposes can be used in accordance
with flight software for ‘line-up’. Larger ships may have small
specialized docking subsystems which run effectively autonomously of the
rest of the flight systems and are invoked only during docking. Usually
both vehicles exchange flight information and both flight computers
calculate the fine adjustments. Occasionally the docking process is
different, such as when manual docking is required (massive computer
system failure), or when docking with a derelict or non-active vehicle.
The two most important processes that need to be considered in a
final docking line-up are range-finding and orientation alignment.
Range-finding can be measured from laser or radar altimetry devices that
most vehicles will possess, other systems can also be used for range
finding such as the use of stereographic telescopic measurement
(measuring target distance through twin telescopes) or by rapid laser
beam splitting range finding (using a laser to ‘read’ the docking
surfaces topology). Orientation alignment is achieved by acquiring
docking markers, such as navigation light or surface markings, these are
called passive alignment features, more sophisticated alignment can be
based on laser beam methods, or from measuring plane polarized light
emitted from a docking source.
As
a general rule it takes longer for a large ship to dock than a smaller
one, as with the increase in size a greater problem with alignment and
also approach velocity (final approaches are often in mere mm/s, this
needs to be small as a large carries much more inertia than say a small
shuttle).
|